
Pharmaceutical Blackout: The Hidden Threat to U.S. Security
Last updated 06:44 AM EDT • Read time: 5m
Imagine a crisis where U.S. citizens are abruptly cut off from lifesaving medications. Pharmacy shelves are empty. And medicine cabinets lay bare. This isn’t a far-fetched dystopia. It’s a real and growing threat. Generic drugs, which make up nearly 90% of U.S. prescriptions, depend on Chinese and Indian manufacturing for active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), finished dosage forms, or both. In the event of a possible – if not probable – trade war or geopolitical rupture, these supply chains could be severed; leaving Americans vulnerable to “pharmacological blackouts.”
Senators in June reintroduced the bipartisan RAPID Reserve Act, a legislative lifeline designed to prevent a pharmacological blackout. And as Congress reconvenes in the coming weeks, policy makers should not only advance RAPID’s call to bring critical medicine manufacturing back to U.S. shores and build strategic reserves, they should go further.
Three decades of a combination of economic forces and strategic decisions hollowed out the domestic generic drug manufacturing base. First, the consolidation within the commercial channels (retailers, wholesalers, and pharmacy benefit managers) shifted market leverage heavily toward the buyers. Increased leverage allowed these buyers to aggressively negotiate lower prices for generic drugs and erode profit margins of drug manufacturers. At the same time, Indian and Chinese manufacturers – benefiting from significantly lower production costs – entered the market. Many Western companies followed suit, either building or acquiring manufacturing facilities in India to remain cost competitive. The influx of low-cost suppliers gave the buyers even greater leverage and pushed prices and manufacturer margins even lower. We now have a system where generic drugs make up 90% of prescriptions but account for just 10% of drug revenue – leaving little financial incentive to manufacture them onshore or invest in supply chain resilience.
Market forces have created unsustainable economics and a reliance on offshore manufacturing. These market forces will not solve the very problem that they created. An active, strategic federal response is required to restore domestic manufacturing capacity and protect the public.
We need look no further than the semiconductor industry for inspiration. After years of dependence on Taiwan and South Korea, the U.S. government deployed $53 billion under the 2022 CHIPS Act to revive domestic chip production when it became clear that market forces alone wouldn’t protect national security. While chips represent a concentrated, high-value sector, the generic pharmaceutical supply chain is sprawling, fragmented, and far less valuable. Yet it is no less critical. In a geopolitical crisis, these dependencies could quickly become choke points. Pharmaceutical supply chains are as critical to national security as semiconductor supply chains; therefore, the government must treat them with similar urgency.
As a prerequisite, it is critical to identify which medicines are truly mission critical. This begins with establishing a consolidated national list of essential drugs to guide strategic investment. The U.S. must also consider which disease areas are likely to shift from chemically synthesized drugs to biologics in the near future, to avoid investing in capabilities that may soon be obsolete. Once the essential drug list is in place, the federal government must take decisive steps to onshore production and build a resilient, secure supply chain. To address this urgent need, the U.S. government must take the following action:
- Set a production deadline. Mandate that U.S. government agencies only purchase essential drugs manufactured domestically after a fixed date.
- Guarantee pricing floors. Establish a Price Loss Coverage model – used successfully in agriculture – for key generics, ensuring predictable revenue and long-term investment returns for U.S.-based manufacturers.
- Launch a CHIPS-style loan program. Fund active ingredient and finished dosage manufacturing facilities through low-cost federal capital and loan guarantees, unlocking private investment at scale.
- Streamline approvals. Empower the FDA to fast-track reviews of new drug manufacturing plants and facilitate technology transfers. Prioritize EPA and state-level permits for pharma projects as critical infrastructure.
- Stockpile strategically. Move beyond the six-month reserve proposed in RAPID. Offer incentives for U.S. manufacturers to build API inventory buffers of 2.5 to 3 years – where shelf life allows – creating resilience against disruptions. A longer reserve horizon, coupled with regular replenishment, would provide a safeguard against global disruptions and supply shocks at minimal cost.
- Build allied capacity. Onshoring drug manufacturing is essential for security but can drive up costs. To maintain affordability, the U.S. should incentivize multiple friendly developing nations – such as Vietnam – to produce critical APIs and finished dosage forms, rather than focusing on more saturated sectors like microchips. This broader network mitigates the risk of relying on just 1–2 countries and strengthens overall supply chain resilience.
The stakes are clear: Americans’ health hangs on economically unstable supply chains that are concentrated overseas. Rebuilding domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing is not just an economic issue but a national security imperative. By guaranteeing fair prices for U.S. generics, prioritizing U.S. manufacturing, investing in factories, and reducing regulatory approval time, we ensure that if global politics turn hostile, Americans will still have their medications. The policy roadmap is available; the crisis is real. We must act now.
Gen. Tim Ray (U.S. Air Force, ret.) is president and CEO of Business Executives for National Security. He previously served as Commander of Air Force Global Strike Command. Stuart Glickman, a leading pharmaceutical operations and supply chain executive, most recently headed Supply Chain and Manufacturing Services at Emergent BioSolutions.

The Unfinished Reform
By Mark W. Castillon • RealClearDefense
Winning the Data Advantage
By Turin Pollard • RealClearDefense
The Pentagon’s Quantum Race Needs a Warfighter’s Scorecard
By Burak Oktenli • RealClearDefense
The F/A-XX and the AIM-260 Reclaim the Perimeter
By Bruce Allen Lubbering • RealClearDefense
Iranian Cyber Operations
By Michael Groen • RealClearDefense

Winning the Data Advantage
By Turin Pollard • RealClearDefense
The F/A-XX and the AIM-260 Reclaim the Perimeter
By Bruce Allen Lubbering • RealClearDefense
Winning the Data Advantage
By Turin Pollard, RealClearDefense
The F/A-XX and the AIM-260 Reclaim the Perimeter
By Bruce Allen Lubbering, RCD
F-22 Pilot Directs CCA in Flight as ‘Airborne QB’
By Stephen Losey, Air & Space Forces
