Skip to main content

Grand Strategy

RealClear Context

Click below to continue reading this story, discover more Grand Strategy stories from over 25 years of RealClear archives, or follow this topic to stay in the know.

Lucas F. Schleusener • DODReads

Great Power, Great Responsibility

How the Liberal International Order Shapes U.S. Foreign Policy

6h agoRead it on DODReads
1,550 stories
2d ago
Lucas F. Schleusener • DODReads

Great Power, Great Responsibility

How the Liberal International Order Shapes U.S. Foreign Policy

2d agoRead it on DODReads
3d ago
Efraín Vázquez-Vera • RealClearDefense

The Pacific's Maginot Line

How China Outflanked Western Strategy

3d agoRead it on RealClearDefense
3d ago
Antulio J. Echevarria II • Military Strategy Magazine

Outpacing: A Grand Strategy for Avoiding the Carthaginian Error

Strategic rivalry is a particular species of strategic competition in the same way nuclear arms are a specific species of weaponry: both involve...

3d agoRead it on Military Strategy Magazine
3d ago
Francis P. Sempa • The American Spectator

Realism and Restraint Aren't the Same Thing

America First has never meant America Only

3d agoRead it on The American Spectator
1w ago

Key Principles of the Democratic World in Response to Authoritarian Challenges

Sergey E. Ivashchenko • RealClearDefense • October 8, 2026

The contemporary international security environment is undergoing a period in which democratic states face increasing pressure from authoritarian regimes. These regimes employ military, informational, economic, and technological instruments to expand their influence and undermine the resilience of democratic societies. In recent years, it has become evident that traditional response mechanisms—based on inertia and expectations of gradual crisis resolution—have ceased to function effectively. The democratic world has found itself in a situation that requires not only timely reaction but also a strategic reassessment of the principles on which collective security is built.

Military threats posed by authoritarian states have acquired a transregional character. The aggression against Ukraine has become the largest armed conflict in Europe since the Second World War and has demonstrated that dictatorships are willing to use force to alter international borders. At the same time, there is a growing level of strategic tension in the Indo‑Pacific region, where authoritarian states are showing a clear intention to revise the existing balance of power. These developments are interconnected: together they form a unified field of instability that compels democratic countries to act in a coordinated manner to preserve an international order based on the rule of law.

2w ago
Jeremy Black • Strategy Page

The Return of the Great Powers

A Problematic Look at the Hackneyed Idea of a Great Power Competition

2w agoRead it on Strategy Page
3w ago
Sune Engel Rasmussen • The Wall Street Journal

Here's What Trump's Greenland Deal Means for the U.S.

Agreement will clear the way for an expanded U.S. military presence on the Arctic island

3w agoRead it on The Wall Street Journal
3w ago
Francis P. Sempa • The American Spectator

Waging Peace in a 2026 World Rhyming With 1956

As crises converge in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Taiwan, Eisenhower's Cold War realism offers lessons for avoiding a wider war.

3w agoRead it on The American Spectator
09/15/26
John Teichert • RealClearDefense

The Foundations of America's National Security Future

As the United States strives to achieve its national security objectives around the world, it is becoming ever clearer that the foundations of its...

09/15/26Read it on RealClearDefense