Right To Repair Carries Greater Risk Than Reward for Our Warfighters

When I took command of the USS Cole, I accepted more than responsibility for a ship. I accepted the weight of accountability and trust. Every sailor depended on the ship’s systems to function exactly as designed, without compromise. Each component, from the propulsion system to the smallest circuit breaker, represented a link in a chain built through rigorous design and maintenance. That design was tested on October 12, 2000, when terrorists attacked our ship in the port of Aden, Yemen. The training, equipment, and rigor of our maintenance and training programs held the crew together and saved lives. In those critical moments of chaos, reliability was not a convenience. It was survival.

The consequences of that uncertainty do not appear during a budget meeting in Washington. They appear at sea, when a crew depends on that system to respond in combat or during an emergency. In other words, our very national security is at risk.

In leading the USS Cole, I asked sailors to live by procedures that were tested, proven, and codified. They safeguarded personnel and equipment alike. Any unauthorized modification to critical systems could have rendered them unreliable or unsafe. If the “Right to Repair” legislation allows unvetted parties to access military technology, even indirectly, it could create vulnerabilities in hardware integrity, cybersecurity, and supply-chain security. Our adversaries study every potential weakness. They do not need another doorway left open through misguided legislation intended for consumer products but carelessly applied to national defense.

There is also a deeper issue of accountability. When a certified defense contractor performs maintenance or repair, there is a clear chain of responsibility. If something fails, we know who is liable. When third-party access is introduced, that chain becomes fragmented. Mistakes become harder to trace. Accountability becomes diluted, and readiness suffers.

Lawmakers must act with caution. The intent to promote affordability and innovation is understandable, but the stakes in defense are not measured in dollars. They are measured in lives and in the credibility of our deterrence. Congress should remove or severely limit the “Right to Repair” provisions as they apply to defense systems and ensure that all military hardware remains within the oversight of certified, accountable, and trusted providers.

My experience aboard the USS Cole taught me that readiness is built on certainty and discipline. We cannot outsource those principles to the lowest bidder or the least regulated provider. Budget decisions made from the safety of the Pentagon and Capitol Hill should not translate to reduced readiness for those who sail in harm’s way. The safety of our sailors and the security of our nation depend on maintaining the highest possible standards, not on lowering them in the name of convenience. I urge lawmakers to protect that trust. Our national security cannot be repaired after the fact. It must be preserved by design.

CDR Kirk S. Lippold (U.S. Navy, ret.) was the Commanding Officer of the USS Cole when it was attacked by al Qaeda terrorists.