Tomahawk Missile's First Mission Was Over...Iran?
Last updated 01:00 AM EDT • Read time: 4m
The iconic American Tomahawk cruise missile has been in service for 32 years, and it’s still getting tweaks and upgrades. The most modern versionâ??—â??the “Block IV”â??—â??can actually change its course mid-flight.
That wasn’t always the case. For most of its history, the Tomahawk was a “fire-and-forget” weaponâ??—â??meaning its target and route required careful plotting, since there was no way to alter its path after launch.
The missiles first flew into action on Jan. 17, 1991 during the Persian Gulf War. The United States fired 288 Tomahawks during the warâ??—â??106 during the opening hours of the air campaign.
American war planners had considerable trepidation about this. Not only was it the Tomahawk’s first combat deployment, the coalition planned to launch the missiles on a course over Iran.
Had a glitch in one of the missile’s computer guidance systems or some other navigationalâ??—â??or humanâ??—â??error occurred, it could have had dangerous consequences.
But why did the U.S. fire them over Iran? The reason is because the guidance system on the early Tomahawk couldn’t navigate over the flat desert terrain of southern Iraq.
This version used a terrain-contour matching system, as opposed to a GPS-guided system fitted on later variants. In a terrain-contour system, the missile cross-references a digital map with terrain data collected by a radar altimeter during flight.
The problem is that the terrain has to be distinct enough for the altimeter to work. Southern Iraq is highly indistinct, and the Tomahawks risked “clobbering” into the ground.
To solve the problem, the U.S. fired the missiles from warships in the Persian Gulf on a course over Iran’s mountainsâ??—â??using them as navigational landmarksâ??—â??before they turned and proceeded toward their pre-programmed targets in the Iraqi capital.
Tehran wasn’t given any prior notification or even a formal heads-up about this. Nor was Iran a member of the coalition against Iraq. The coalition also planned to launch Tomahawks from the eastern Mediterranean over Syria and Turkey, but later scuttled these overflights.
Coalition military commanders weren’t certain everything would go according to planâ??—â??and took precautions in case something went wrong.
“[Navy planners] also seeded the missiles’ software with a ‘friendly virus’ that scrambled much of the sensitive computer coding during flight in case a clobbered Tomahawk fell into unfriendly hands,” the Washington Post reported.
Pres. George H.W. Bush’s advisers were “flabbergasted” at the decision to launch the missiles over Iran, the Post reported.
“We were dealing with neighboring countries who we didn’t want to join the fray,” Vice Adm. Stanley Arthur, the commander of the coalition’s naval forces, told PBS in 1996. “We had never used them in conflict before and there was a lot of apprehension about, ‘Do we launch these things and then they make up their own mind about where they are going?’”
“Downtown Tehran would not have been a good mission,” Arthur added.
No country would be happy with errant missiles crashing into its own territoryâ??—â??least of all Iran. A desolate Iranian mountaintop would have been one thing, but a populated urban area would have been a disastrous blunder.
Iran was only just recovering from its devastating war with Iraq which had raged throughout the 1980s. The war claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. Saddam Hussein’s Scud missiles relentlessly bombarded Iranian cities and the country’s civilian population. Iran retaliated with Scud missiles of its own.
The Persian Gulf War began only three years later. It also wasn’t long after a U.S. Navy warship shot down Iran Air 655 —â??killing 290 people.
American missiles with 1,000-pound warheads crashing into Iranian territory would have likely worsened already estranged relations. But Tehran didn’t react to those overflights, and the missiles didn’t crash into Iran or go off course.
Later flights into Iran’s territory during that war would come in the form of Iraqi air force MiG and Sukhoi jets. These planes landed in Iranian bases to avoid being bombed on the ground or shot out of the sky by coalition forces.
Iran seized the Iraqi planes and incorporated them into its air force, where several still remain in active service. Among those planes were Su-25 Frogfoots, which flew back into Iraq last year to fight Islamic State.
But even though later Tomahawk variants are more accurate, they can still veer off course. During the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, 10 GPS-guided Tomahawks crashed in Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
In Turkey, angry locals threw eggs and rocks at American advisers when they arrived to inspect one of the crash sites. The accident provoked conspiracy theories about an imminent American invasion of Turkey.
Fortunately, none of the stray missiles exploded or killed anyone. But it was still bad enough, and the U.S. halted Tomahawk launches from the Red Sea and the Mediterranean.
Which goes to show that precision-guided weapons are hardly fail-proof.
This piece first appeared in War Is Boring here.

A Defense Win for Americans and Israelis in Arkansas
By Bradley Bowman • RealClearDefense
A Path to Success Against Iran
By Michael Schwartz • RealClearDefense
The World Cup Is Over. The Drone Threat Isn’t.
By Mitzi Perdue • RealClearDefense
AI Should Speed Veterans’ Benefits, Not Decide Them
By Rob Schroder • RealClearDefense
Don’t Be Swayed by Tactical Nukes
By Benjamin Giltner • RealClearDefense

Big Surface Combatants are so Hot Right Now
By CDR Salamander
USS Stout Loses Power During Port Visit Due to ‘Engineering Casualty’
By USNI News
Air Force Lessons Learned From Operation Epic Fury
By Tabitha Reeves, National Defense
Marines Need Nine More Amphibious Warships To Carry Out Its Missions
By TWZ
AFRL, ACC Fly XQ-67A Drone To Test Autonomous Teaming
By Airforce Technology
