The war with Iran looms over the midterm elections. Nearly three in four Americans are very concerned about fuel prices, and two in three now disapprove of the war. Explanations on offer run from grand geopolitics to conspiracy theories that Israel dragged America into it. Americans deserve a plain answer to why we are fighting. There is a practical step President Trump can announce now that explains all and creates an opportunity for a major policy upgrade for the American homeland.

On the morning of October 12, 2000, a small boat masquerading as a garbage barge in the harbor at Aden, Yemen, came alongside the USS Cole, the destroyer I commanded. In a split second, two al Qaeda suicide bombers detonated an improvised explosive device against the hull of our ship, killing 17 of my sailors.

For years afterward, I was asked what I had done to prevent that attack. I had submitted a force protection plan for that port and my chain of command approved it. What failed was the intelligence that would have told me what was coming. I never had a chance.

Refrigerators are probably the last thing anyone would consider a national security vulnerability, which is precisely why the unusual refrigeration failures at U.S. military commissaries deserve more attention than they are getting. There is no public evidence that the incidents were caused by a cyberattack or a foreign adversary, and they may ultimately prove to be nothing more than equipment, software, or maintenance failures. But when refrigeration systems at multiple military installations experience problems within a relatively short period and at Fort Huachuca all of the commissary's freezers reportedly went into defrost mode overnight, leaders at the Pentagon should be asking a larger question: If a sophisticated adversary wanted to test its ability to disrupt the infrastructure supporting America's military without firing a shot, is this what it might look like?

That question matters because China and other U.S. adversaries are no longer thinking about cyber warfare simply as stealing secrets or attacking classified networks. They are looking for ways to penetrate the infrastructure America depends upon and, when necessary, create disruption, confusion, and delay. It echoes the familiar warnings of a certain rail conductor from a beloved children’s television show about a talking train. U.S. intelligence and cybersecurity agencies have already warned that Chinese state-sponsored actors have gained access to American critical infrastructure and, in some cases, appear to be positioning themselves for potential disruption during a future conflict. A coordinated attack against something as ordinary as refrigeration would therefore not have to cause catastrophic damage to be successful. The objective could be much simpler: get inside, disrupt operations, complicate the response, and watch how America responds.