
An America First Peace Plan in Ukraine
Last updated 07:36 AM EST • Read time: 5m
When Russian commentators watched the swift capture of Nicolás Maduro and his wife during Operation Absolute Resolve, their reaction was telling. “This is exactly how our ‘special military operation’ was meant to unfold: fast, dramatic and decisive,” one wrote. The envy was not accidental. It reflected a hard truth for Russia: decisive leadership and operational discipline still matter in global affairs, and the United States has not lost its edge.
As the name of the operation makes clear, the Trump administration has demonstrated that the United States will use force when necessary to protect its interests. And those interests do not stop at the Western Hemisphere. They extend to global energy markets threatened by Iran, to supply chains and maritime routes increasingly challenged by China, and to stopping adversaries from rewriting the rules of the international system.
As a former Navy Seal and retired Admiral, I am certain the same clarity and strength is critical for guiding U.S. leadership in forging a peace plan to end Russia’s war in Ukraine. If anyone has the leverage and capability to secure a deal that brings a just and lasting peace – and prevents future wars – it is President Trump and his team.
The terms of any final agreement must prevent a Russian reinvasion of Ukraine and deter future attacks on neighboring states, sending a clear signal to China, Iran, and North Korea that authoritarian aggression carries an unacceptable cost. A plan without ironclad U.S. security guarantees will encourage our adversaries to test American resolve, the consequences of which could be deadly for our citizens.
Ukraine is rightly reticent to give up any territory to an authoritarian war criminal in a conflict it did not choose – particularly territory that Russia has not yet captured on the battlefield.
Neither side is going to get everything it wants. But giving way to Putin’s maximalist demands tells autocrats that U.S. security interests are easily negotiable and emboldens bad actors to use future conflicts to reshape Europe and the Middle East to their advantage. Ultimately, a peace plan that protects Ukraine sovereignty and security sends a clear message not only to Russia, but also China, Iran, and North Korea.
China already provides intelligence support to Moscow and helps Russia evade sanctions. Iran continues to provoke the United States through proxy attacks and drone shipments to Russia, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has warned of a “heightened threat environment” linked to Tehran this year. Senior intelligence officials describe China as a “broad, unrelenting threat” to the United States. Seventy-six percent of Republican primary voters express concern that Russia, China, or Iran could strike the United States with drones.
The fact is Russia has violated every major historical security commitment it has made to Ukraine. It has also ignored deals with the United States, including the INF Treaty, and broken ceasefires in Syria and Georgia. In recent months, Putin sent drones buzzing into the airspace of five NATO countries, causing airport disruptions, and increasing the risk of wider war.
The peace plan must unambiguously convey to Putin that any continued aggression against Ukraine and our allies will trigger a forceful response. Any language that relies on broad phrases like “significant” or “deliberate” attack invites manipulation and circumvention.
Russia will trample on any agreement that is not backed by the strength of the United States and our allies. That is why the recent meeting of the Coalition of the Willing matters. Thirty-three nations have outlined a framework for real security guarantees, including continuous ceasefire monitoring led by the United States with international participation, European-led reassurance measures in the air, at sea, and on land, and a clear commitment to regenerate Ukraine’s armed forces. With U.S. intelligence, logistics, and support pledged in the event of renewed Russian aggression, this coalition sends an unmistakable message to Moscow that a ceasefire will be enforced, and future attacks will be met with a unified response.
And while consensus on security guarantees for Ukraine is – in Jared Kushner’s words – “a very very big milestone”, this “reassurance force” is only relevant after a ceasefire is struck – it is not a mechanism that forces Russia to the negotiating table.
Recent U.S. intervention in Venezuela has already demonstrated how decisive American action can disrupt adversaries’ revenue streams by driving down global oil prices and directly undercutting Russia’s ability to finance its war. That pressure must continue and intensify. Cracking down on Russia’s shadow fleet and enforcing existing energy sanctions will further drain Moscow’s war chest and make clear that time and economics are not on their side.
Strong, clear deterrence measures and security guarantees prevent wars. The United States and President Trump have the opportunity to forge a lasting plan that protects U.S. security and economic interests and restores peace in Europe. It’s time to strike that deal.
Vice Admiral Robert Harward (U.S. Navy, ret.) is the former Deputy Commander, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

In Pursuit of Nuclear Abolition
By Peter Huessy • RealClearDefense
Innovation Alone Won’t Prepare the U.S. for the Future Battlefield
By Joshua Segal • RealClearDefense
The sUAS Tactical Trifecta
By Bryan T. Woody • RealClearDefense
The Revolutionary War: When Strategic Options Share the Same Weakness
By Henry Yep • RealClearDefense
The Houthis Are Testing the Limits of Collective Defense
By Saima Afzal • RealClearDefense

Navy Civilianizes Six Former Flag Billets, Reduces Six to Captains
By Mongilio, USNI N.
Raytheon's $8B Contract for Strategic Comms Terminal Modernization
By M+A El
America’s Maritime Moment Will Not Wait
By CDR Salamander
Armor Up?
By Marine Corps Compass Points
Who Shoots Down the Drone Over the Shipyard?
By John Ferrari & Dillon Prochnicki • RealClearDefense
