
Amphibious Warfare is not Dead, Its Only Sleeping
Last updated 07:03 AM EDT • Read time: 4m
Eighty years ago, U.S. Marines stormed ashore at Iwo Jima a battle that became immortalized with a statue in Arlington Cemetery. Seventy-Five years ago, they took Inchon in the last great amphibious operation of modern times. Some would-be strategists think it will be the last one in history. I say Not so fast.
When former Marine Corps commandant David Berger claimed thar the traditional amphibious operations were no longer possible, he set off a chain reaction of events that adversely impacted national defense in ways that he could not foresee. As was the case in most of Berger's decisions and pronouncements, he was wrong. Berger's decisions to allow the Navy out of its long-standing commitment to maintain thirty amphibious ships and his decision to drastically cut Marine Corps offensive combat power has caused a radical decrease in peacetime readiness and wartime flexibility that the Pentagon leadership and Congress have been slow to recognize and remedy.
Berger defended his decisions by pointing out that missile technology has shown the defense had once more become the stronger form of war using heavy tank losses on both sides and the sinking of the heavy Russian cruiser Moskva in the current Russo-Ukraine conflict as proof his prescience. Later events in Ukraine, Gaza, and Yemen showed that premature reading of military events as "proof' of anything can be very dangerous. Tanks and artillery -the very things Berger eliminated or drastically reduce in the Marine Corps' inventory- are high on the wish list of the Ukrainians when they ask for western resupply. Tanks remain the key to Israeli combat power in the Gaza war.
Likewise, despite firing scores of ant-ship missiles at U.S. combatant vessels by the Houthis, not one has been seriously damaged or sunk in the waters bordering Yemen. These are the kind of subsonic missiles Berger and his successor Eric Smith bought to "modernize" the Marine Corps at the expense of ground combat power that marines will need in any long-term war with a modern foe such as China.
Serious military planners in China and the United States -Berger and Smith are not among them- are thinking in terms of hypersonic weapons. The Chinese planners hope to keep the U.S. and its allies at arm’s length as they pursue their goals in the South China sea using their reconnaissance-strike (R-S) complex to threaten the American Navy in any future conflict. Conversely, the Navy and Air Force plan on using hypersonic weapons to degrade that R-S system to a point where it is possible to project U.S. combat power ashore to retake territory or reinforce threatened allies. That will almost certainly require amphibious operations. That power projection will likely come from over the horizon in small, but powerful distributed attack packages. In the last years of the last century, the Marine Corps was working on an operational concept to do just that. It was called Operational Maneuver From the Sea (OMFTS). In his panic over the missile threat Berger abandoned that for a very questionable concept called Force design that is rapidly showing its combat impotency with obsolete equipment while other services pursue real modernization.
The pieces needed to correct the mistakes of the past six years and rebuild an amphibious warfare capability through OMFTS exist, but the current leadership of the Marine Corps has shown itself to be incapable of seeing the world as it is and reversing course before a shooting war shows it the error of its ways. It will take a combination of congressional and civilian leadership, but that cannot be done if we continue to allow people like Berger and Smith continue to emasculate our finest warriors.
Amphibious warfare is not dead; it has been asleep. It is time to wake it up.
Gary Anderson retired as Chief of Staff of the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab. He served as a Special Advisor to the Deputy Secretary of Defense.

We Cannot Build Tomorrow's Weapons With Yesterday's Alloys
By Joseph F. Krause • RealClearDefense
Americans Will Sacrifice for Their Country, Not for Politicians
By Jane Li • RealClearDefense
No Need for a New World Order
By Will Thibeau • RealClearDefense
Congress: Don’t Let the NDAA Hand China Our Defense Blueprints
By Richard Newton • RealClearDefense
Washington Cannot Ignore Afghanistan’s Weapons Legacy
By Saima Afzal • RealClearDefense

Marines Deploy Neros Archer Drone in Live Fire Exercise for First Time
By USNI News
Confessions Of An SR-71 Blackbird Pilot
By Howard Altman, The WarZone
Air Force Exploring Creative Ways to Produce More Pilots
By Laura Heckmann, NatDef
"Super F-22' Propels Rator to Fly With F-47 Into 2060s
By Kris Osborn, Warrior Maven
GA-ASI and Saab Test AEW Payload on MQ-9B
By Stefano D'Urso, The Aviationist
