Preventing a "Fait Accompli" in Syria
Last updated 05:46 PM EDT • Read time: 3m
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson met with representatives of 17 like-minded nations to discuss the future of Syria last week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. Following the meeting, Ambassador David Satterfield, acting assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, said the U.S. and its partners were firmly opposed to “accepting a fait accompli” in which the Assad regime and its Iranian patrons consolidate their grip on Syria with the expected defeat of the Islamic State.
Satterfield argued that the urgent need for aid to rebuild Syria would ultimately compel Assad and his patrons to engage in a “credible political process that reflects the will of the majority of Syrians.” Without such a process, he said, “you’re not going to get international participation in Syria, and that’s vital. The regime needs it. Russia needs it.”
The U.S. should by no means finance the recovery of a nation dominated by Assad. And there is little reason to believe that withholding such aid will sway the calculus of the regime and its patrons in Tehran. Rather, the effective route to building leverage at the negotiating table is to consolidate and expand the influence of U.S. partner forces in eastern Syria, especially the Sunni Arab elements within the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).
However, the U.S. has sent mixed signals regarding its readiness to compete with the Iranian axis for influence in eastern Syria, or even to acknowledge that such a competition is under way. Earlier this month, President Trump stated, “We have very little to do with Syria other than killing ISIS. What we do is we kill ISIS.” Similarly, Satterfield listed the defeat of the Islamic State as the top priority, followed by a need to “end the violence.”
In contrast, Tillerson declared last month that putting an end to “Iran’s military influence” in Syria is one of two essential U.S. objectives. To that end, the U.S. military is supporting an SDF offensive designed to prevent the Assad regime and its partners from establishing a dominant position in the oil-rich province of Deir Ezzor. Journalists now describe the SDF-Assad competition as a race for eastern Syria, reminiscent of the race between U.S. and Soviet forces to claim the lion’s share of German territory in 1945.
One of the most concerning aspects of the regime offensive in the east is the prominent role played by Hezbollah and other Iranian proxy forces, such as the Fatemiyoun Division, composed of Shiite fighters from Afghanistan. Unless the U.S. commits to preventing the march of these forces, Iran will be the ultimate victor of the Syria conflict, thereby expanding its influence across the Middle East and setting the stage for future conflict – with both Sunni states and with Israel. Indeed, this would likely mark not the end of a war, but rather the beginning of yet another.
David Adesnik is the director of research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Follow him on Twitter @adesnik.
This article appeared originally at Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
In Pursuit of Nuclear Abolition
By Peter Huessy • RealClearDefense
Innovation Alone Won’t Prepare the U.S. for the Future Battlefield
By Joshua Segal • RealClearDefense
The sUAS Tactical Trifecta
By Bryan T. Woody • RealClearDefense
The Revolutionary War: When Strategic Options Share the Same Weakness
By Henry Yep • RealClearDefense
The Houthis Are Testing the Limits of Collective Defense
By Saima Afzal • RealClearDefense
Who Shoots Down the Drone Over the Shipyard?
By John Ferrari & Dillon Prochnicki • RealClearDefense
Northrop Grumman Breaks Out the Big Guns at AUSA
By Daniel Terrill, Defense News
Army Pursuing Diverse Array of New Anti-Air Interceptors
By Trevithick, The WarZoneWho Shoots Down the Drone Over the Shipyard?
By John Ferrari & Dillon Prochnicki, RCD
F-35C Lands for the First Time on a Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier
By The Aviationist